Thursday, January 13, 2011
Conversion Law
Conversion occurs when one individual asserts a claim (or dominion and control) over the property of another without justification or excuse. If a person retains possession of property after someone else has demanded its return, their refusal to cooperate constitutes conversion of the property in question. Regardless of the converter's intent to use, damage, or simply withhold the converted property, he has violated the rights of the property owner.
Bonding Off Tractor Trailer
The driver of a tractor-trailer, for example, has been granted custody of his or her cargo by a shipper. If the tractor-trailer is towed from the highway, the tower may have a lien on the vehicle for the value of his services. In other words, the tower has a certain right to retain the shipper's property until the debt for his services is paid. However, some towers refuse to release cargo even when they have no right to do so. If a tower continues to withhold cargo after the rightful owner has demanded its return, he has wrongfully converted the cargo.
Cargo conversion is a form of theft
The experts at Paullin Law Firm know your rights -- if you have experienced property conversion, let us recover what is rightfully yours. Contact our attorneys at (804) 423-7423 for personal, practical, and aggressive representation.
The
information and materials on this web site are intended to be used for
informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice.
Individuals should not act upon information provided on the site without
seeking professional legal counsel, as situations and facts vary with
each case. In addition, Paullin Law Firm does not endorse or sponsor any
content accessed through links to other web sites. All statements and
information are current as of the posted date.
Friday, October 22, 2010
Defense attorney Mark Paullin successfully defended a tractor trailer driver in a recent case with a jury verdict of $185,000 against a demand of $500,000. See the recent article as published in
Virginia Lawyers Weekly. The plaintiff claimed lost wages, personal injury, and loss of earning capacity. The trial was held in the Norfolk Circuit Court in Virginia.